There's a reason that after the EF 100-400 came out, the 300/4 and 400/5.6 just languished, and we had the EF 100-400 II and now the RF 100-500 f/4.5-7.1. That's the reason we won't see an RF 500/6.3.Why not a Canon RF 500 mm 6.3L?? I miss the old Canon EF 400mm 5.6L, it was such an amazing lens!
It's the same reason we have an RF 100-300/2.8 instead of an RF 300/2.8, and we're supposed to get an RF 200-500/4 instead of an RF 500/4.
I trust you see the pattern...
Upvote
0