I like to travel very light. The battery charger and plug is extra bulk; if I could charge from a powerbank (which I pack for emergencies anyway) that saves me a bit of space and weight. The alternatives are don't take the camera at all, or hope my batteries last the whole trip.It takes 30 seconds to change a battery and the camera is tied up for 3 hours with in-camera charging. I think the craze for in-camera charging stems from phones with fixed batteries that you have to charge in the phone. Can't imagine any serious camera user not having extra batteries and a charger.
In the twentyish years I've used a phone without a replaceable battery, I haven't missed that ability at all.That is why I keep spare batteries. For a phone, it is handy to have both options. Recharge at night in phone, but a spare (or 2) for long conversations or long periods off grid. For a camera, the battery life is much shorter in high-use situations, so spare batteries are essential. The permanent in-phone battery problem has been somewhat mitigated by power banks, but now you have a brick bigger than the phone to carry around. An Olympus TG series camera is a good example of how a phone could be built. My TG6 has a removable battery that can be charged in the phone or out. It has external jacks and actual controls but will still survive (and operate) 50 ft under water.
Upvote
0