RF 10-20 availability
- Thread starter David Pro
- Start date
Adorama lists the expected availability as May (though that slipped back from April a few weeks ago).
With some googling and a few phone calls, I luckily found a small shop that actually had one in stock in mid-February (I ordered it online immediately and received it two days later).
Minimally, place a preorder with a large retailer and also set a CPW alert in case a shipment shows up somewhere else (as has happened for the 24-105/2.8 and 200-800 recently).
With some googling and a few phone calls, I luckily found a small shop that actually had one in stock in mid-February (I ordered it online immediately and received it two days later).
Minimally, place a preorder with a large retailer and also set a CPW alert in case a shipment shows up somewhere else (as has happened for the 24-105/2.8 and 200-800 recently).
Upvote
0
As usual (at least, usual for the past few years), those who place a preorder within an hour or two of the announcement get the lens from the initial shipment, and those who don’t have to wait a few months.
Upvote
0
I just snagged one from K & M Camera, they literally just got it in an hour before I called. Adorama now doesn't expect them until June, so this was an unexpected surprise. Can't wait to try this baby out, just the other day I was wishing I had it when 14mm wasn't enough. Should make for some interesting work!
Upvote
0
Glad you were able to finally obtain a copy. I am waiting for the weather to warm up a bit more and then I will take the 10-20 mm out.
Upvote
0
I'd love to have one of these lenses, but I need a cpl so much I'm afraid I wouldn't carry it often. Love the ef 11-24, which fworks for me due to the adapter.
Upvote
0
Not enough time to sleep!
Do you say, "two point five," or, "two and a half"?
Upvote
0
You snooze, you lose.
For time, I’d say two and a half…but as a scientist, I might say 2.5×10^0.
Upvote
0
As a scientist it should be 9x10^3 s.You snooze, you lose.
For time, I’d say two and a half…but as a scientist, I might say 2.5×10^0.
But, biologists don’t seem to worry about SI units.
Upvote
0
Says someone from the country that gave us the furlong, the gill and the stone.As a scientist it should be 9x10^3 s.
At least you don’t live in a country that still uses that archaic system.
Upvote
0
Our gallon is bigger than yours. We get better mpg.Says someone from the country that gave us the furlong, the gill and the stone.
At least you don’t live in a country that still uses that archaic system.
Upvote
0
Similar threads
