AcutancePhotography said:Hillsilly said:for all intensive purposes
?
Perhaps "for all intents and purposes"?
I thought it was "for all in tents and porpoises" ;D
Upvote
0
AcutancePhotography said:Hillsilly said:for all intensive purposes
?
Perhaps "for all intents and purposes"?
Over here it generally does. I know a bit about Australian law - certainly more than I do about cameras (I did a law degree a few years ago - I'm a bushranger by trade and a little bit of legal knowledge comes in handy.). Over here, it's pretty settled that as long as the conditions are bought to your attention before you purchase the ticket then the terms are valid. (Otherwise, what's the point of contracts?)mackguyver said:Only a lawyer can advise you of the law and your options, but just because something is printed on a piece of paper doesn't make it legal or enforceable.
That's interesting and let me clarify things a bit here in the U.S. with an example:Hillsilly said:Over here it generally does. I know a bit about Australian law - certainly more than I do about cameras (I did a law degree a few years ago - I'm a bushranger by trade and a little bit of legal knowledge comes in handy.). Over here, it's pretty settled that as long as the conditions are bought to your attention before you purchase the ticket then the terms are valid. (Otherwise, what's the point of contracts?)mackguyver said:Only a lawyer can advise you of the law and your options, but just because something is printed on a piece of paper doesn't make it legal or enforceable.
That being said, as you'd expected, a quick search suggests that Cricket Australia haven't gone around suing people for uploading cricket photos over the last couple of years. The worst realistic problem is that they won't let you through the gate with a bigger lens.
mackguyver said:Your valet parking ticket says "Not Responsible for Loss or Damage" but they bring back your car with no radio and a smashed windshield.