More information about the Canon PowerShot G5 X Mark II and PowerShot G7 X Mark III

[CANNOT]

First looks by 3rd parties:





More Canon Official videos | https://www.youtube.com/user/CanonNorthAmerica/videos , e.g.:

 

[powershot2012]

Yes, same specs as the sensor in the RX100 m4.

So Canon officially confirms Sony sensor in G5X II

"Enjoy sensational image quality from a 20.1-megapixel 1.0-type stacked sensor "

 

[Stereodude]

Well, it doesn't seem like they Canon'd the G7X III quite as much as I was expecting based on Canon's history, but the lack of p24 video is a weird, head scratching omission.

 

[CANNOT]

Full info and samples:

> G7XmkIII | https://www.usa.canon.com/internet/...hoot/advanced-cameras/powershot-g7-x-mark-iii
> G5XmkII | https://www.usa.canon.com/internet/...shoot/advanced-cameras/powershot-g5-x-mark-ii

More video samples, regular/slowmo/timelapse on https://www.youtube.com/user/CanonMarketingJapan/videos , e.g.:

 

[Kit.]

> G7XmkIII | https://www.usa.canon.com/internet/...hoot/advanced-cameras/powershot-g7-x-mark-iii
> G5XmkII | https://www.usa.canon.com/internet/...shoot/advanced-cameras/powershot-g5-x-mark-ii

Some weird stuff there (like G7X has "WiFi" remote control, G5X has "none"). Probably a bug in the specs.

But these cameras definitely have clear (and different) positioning.

 

[CANNOT]

I hated when Panasonic brought us the G9... the GH5 and then the GH5S.
Like... dang it Panasonic. Just make one camera that does it all already.
You want me to buy 3 cameras, don't you? Well, I'm buying the BMPCC4K over the GH5S. You happy now? You're pushing me away, damnit.

 

[Stereodude]

More video samples, regular/slowmo/timelapse on https://www.youtube.com/user/CanonMarketingJapan/videos , e.g.:

If that's Canon putting their best foot forward with promo footage, yikes... The timelapse is almost passable the others are really soft. It looks like 720p video that's been scaled up.

Compared to the UHD and HD footage from the RX100 MkVA or RX100 MkVI it's a big joke.

 

[PVCC]

If that's Canon putting their best foot forward with promo footage, yikes... The timelapse is almost passable the others are really soft. It looks like 720p video that's been scaled up.

Compared to the UHD and HD footage from the RX100 MkVA or RX100 MkVI it's a big joke.

Does Canon specify the original picture resolution used to create in-camera timelapse??
If it's not high-res, it would be useless, and I couldn't believe Canon would do so bad move at this point