How would you describe the difference between the R5 and the R3 EVF?
I didn't have enough time to thoroughly check for differences, in fact, I didn't notice any. Maybe by testing under absolutely identical conditions one could perceive some slight advantages for the R3 ???
TDP seems to have noticed an improvement when reviewing the R3.
But both (R5 and R3) are noticably better, meaning really good, than the R6 II's EVF.
Viewfinder quality (and bigger size!) are for me of utter importance, much more than MP count, fps, video features etc...
Maybe because I got spoiled by the 5 D III & IV, Leica's R6, Nikon's F2 and disappointed by the EOS R's EVF.