I am missing a RF 50 1.4, but it seems Canon's strategy is to sell first the cheap 1.8 and expensive 1.2, and then bring out the mid-range 1.4. In that case, those who bought the 1.8 would upgrade by buying the 1.4, and some who bought the 1.2 would sell them if they needed money and buy the cheaper 1.4. Thus Canon will have more sales. Until now I have not seen a RF 1.4 in any range and it is clear that this is their selling strategy.
I would also like Canon to make some cheaper and smaller L-lenses. For example, a RF 28-70 f4 L would be great. It does not need to be 24-70 because would be bigger, heavier and more expensive. 28-70 is a reasonable range. The same way that did the 28-70 f2 or the old 28-70 f2.8 L.
In my opinion, it is time for Canon to design a cheaper and smaller 28-70 f4 L, for those who don't want to spend a lot of money but still want the L-quality.
I would also like Canon to make some cheaper and smaller L-lenses. For example, a RF 28-70 f4 L would be great. It does not need to be 24-70 because would be bigger, heavier and more expensive. 28-70 is a reasonable range. The same way that did the 28-70 f2 or the old 28-70 f2.8 L.
In my opinion, it is time for Canon to design a cheaper and smaller 28-70 f4 L, for those who don't want to spend a lot of money but still want the L-quality.
Upvote
0